Professors who have made recommendations

Garnett, Rick (Notre Dame)

Shaughnessy, Joan (Washington & Lee)

 

 

 

Pending cases for
which we are posting recommendations

Click on a case for an up-to-date ranking of recommended readings. (Cases with an asterisk* have recommendations.)

Doe v. Roe, 13-1011 (fictional sample)

Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transp., 13-553

Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, 13-895 and Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama, 13-1138

B&B Hardware v. Hargis Indus., 13-352

Comptroller v. Wynne, 13-485

Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius, 13-356

Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC v. Owens, 13-719

Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean, 13-894

Direct Marketing Ass’n v. Brohl, 13-1032

Elonis v. U.S., 13-983

Heien v. North Carolina, 13-604

Holt v. Hobbs, 13-6827

Integrity Staffing Solutions v. Busk, 13-433

Jennings v. Stephens, 13-7211

Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 13-684

KBR v. U.S. ex rel. Carter, 12-1497

Johnson v. United States, 13-7120

Law v. Siegel, 12-5196

Lawson v. FMR, 12-3

M&G Polymers v. Tackett, 13-1010

North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC, 13-534

Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council, 13-435

OneOk v. Learjet, 13-271

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, 13-1041, and Nickols v. Mortgage Bankers Association, 13-1052

Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. IndyMac MBS, Inc., 13-640

Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 13-502

T-Mobile South v. City of Roswell, 13-975

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 13-854

Tibbals v. Carter, 11-218

U.S. v. Wurie, 13-212

Warger v. Shauers, 13-517

Wellness International Network v. Sharif, 13-935

Yates v. U.S., 13-7451

Young v. UPS, 12-1226

Zivotofksy v. Kerry, 13-628


Decided cases for
which we posted recommendations

*Clapper v. Amnest Int’l USA, 11-1025

*Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell, 10-1491

 

Law Professors,*
Make Your Recommendations

Helpful Legal Scholarship for the
Supreme Court

In the form below you may recommend:

(A) up to five works of legal scholarship (by authors other than yourself) that ought to be read by a Justice deciding the case you specify and

(B) your own best relevant work as well.

Your recommendations will be posted at a link to the appropriate case (at right) and a link to your name (at left), but only after someone from the Green Bag emails/phones you at the address/number we find on your page at your law school’s website to verify that it really is you who completed this form (to minimize fraud on us and spam at you).

Questions? Comments? Ideas? Changed your mind about your recommendations? Please email us.

If you prefer paper to pixels, please click here, print out and complete the form, and mail it to us.

For a long explanation of this form, click here. For commentary about helpful scholarship, click here.

* If you are a scholar in a field other than law (or a legal scholar not yet tenured in a law school), please be patient. We are starting small and hope to cover other fields soon. We also hope to come up with or be shown a marker of scholarliness that is more accurate and reliable than tenure. We welcome your suggestions.